DefinePK

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the editorial policies of Al-Safiir, a prominent Lebanese newspaper, focusing on the implications for media ethics and journalistic integrity. The research employs a qualitative case study methodology, examining Al-Safiir's editorial guidelines, decision-making processes, and the ethical considerations that underpin its reporting practices. Through an in-depth review of both historical and contemporary editorial stances, the study highlights the challenges faced by Al-Safiir in maintaining journalistic standards amid a complex socio-political landscape marked by sectarian tensions and censorship pressures. The findings reveal that Al-Safiir's editorial policies are shaped by a commitment to public accountability, yet they also reflect the inherent tensions between journalistic autonomy and external influences, including political affiliations and public expectations. This analysis contributes to the broader discourse on media ethics, particularly in regions characterized by conflict and political instability. By evaluating the extent to which Al-Safiir adheres to ethical journalism principles, the study underscores the importance of transparent editorial practices in fostering trust between media outlets and their audiences. The results indicate a need for ongoing dialogue within the media community regarding ethical standards, suggesting that a robust framework for media ethics can enhance journalistic credibility and protect the integrity of the press in challenging environments. Ultimately, this case study of Al-Safiir serves as a critical reference point for understanding the interplay between editorial policies and media ethics, offering valuable insights for journalists, editors, and media scholars.
Keywords: Al-Safiir, media ethics, editorial policies, journalistic integrity, qualitative case study, Lebanon, political influences, sectarian tensions, ethical journalism, public accountability.