DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Comparing low fidelity simulation/model and hybrid simulation techniques for teaching how to perform intramuscular injections: a case control study


Article Information

Title: Comparing low fidelity simulation/model and hybrid simulation techniques for teaching how to perform intramuscular injections: a case control study

Authors: Keziban Amanak 

Journal: Journal of Pakistan Medical Association

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31
X 2023-07-01 2024-09-30
X 2022-07-01 2023-06-30
X 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
X 2020-07-01 2021-06-30
W 2012-07-01 2020-06-30
X 2011-05-13 2012-06-30
Y 1900-01-01 2005-06-30

Publisher: Pakistan Medical Association.

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2020

Volume: 70

Issue: 10

Language: English

Keywords: Hybrid Simulationmidwifery studentsLow-fidelity simulationIntramuscular injections

Categories

Abstract

Abstract


Objective: To compare low-fidelity simulation/model and hybrid simulation techniques for teaching how to perform intramuscular injections.

Methods: The case control study was conducted at the Department of Midwifery, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkey, from May 2 to 25, 2018, and comprised students enrolled in the course of Basic Principles and Practices in Midwifery II. The students were randomly divided into intervention group A and control group B. Those in group A were taught intramuscular injection at an assembly which was prepared through hybrid simulation method, while those in group B made use of the model routinely employed in the midwifery programme. Data was collected using a descriptive characteristics form, the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the State Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Guide to Performing Intramuscular Injections into the Ventro-gluteal Site. Data was analysed using SPSS 20.

Results: Of the 73 students, 37(50.7%) were in group A and 36(49.3%) in group B. There was no difference in terms of age between the groups (p>0.05). Group A had a better total General Self-Efficacy Scale scores compared to group B (p


Paper summary is not available for this article yet.

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...