DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Exploring Impermanence and Arrogance through Formal Analysis: A Study of ‘Ozymandias’


Article Information

Title: Exploring Impermanence and Arrogance through Formal Analysis: A Study of ‘Ozymandias’

Authors: Sumayya Imran, Noorwash Tanoli, Aleena Saleem

Journal: Social Science Review Archives

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31

Publisher: Divine Knowledge Institute

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2024

Volume: 2

Issue: 2

Language: English

DOI: 10.70670/sra.v2i2.221

Categories

Abstract

This paper presents a formal analysis of Percy Bysshe Shelley's “Ozymandias” concentrating on the themes of impermanence and the constraints of human ambition, examined through the use of irony, imagery, and symbolism. The analysis begins by exploring the fragmented statue, symbolizing the unavoidable decline of human creations and the inability of even the most formidable rulers to leave a lasting legacy. Through the imagery of the “colossal wreck” and the “lone and level sands,” Shelley emphasizes the transience of human power, depicting the remnants of Ozymandias's empire as a metaphor for the ephemeral nature of political authority. The poem’s inscription, stating, “Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!” is interpreted as an ironic commentary on the futility of Ozymandias's boast, as it contrasts sharply with the barren and decayed remains of his once-mighty kingdom. Shelley's use of symbolism in the shattered visage of Ozymandias critiques the arrogance of authoritarian power, implying that even the most tyrannical rulers are ultimately subject to the forces of time and nature. The paper examines how the poem's formal elements—its structure, language, and imagery—strengthen its central theme: the transient nature of power and the constraints of human ambition. By conducting a thorough analysis of these literary devices, this study provides a deeper insight into how Ozymandias serves as a timeless commentary on the fallibility of political rulers and the inevitability of decline.


Research Objective

To evaluate the theme of impermanence and the limits of human ambition in Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'Ozymandias' through the use of irony, imagery, and symbolism, and to investigate the use of figurative language in the poem to challenge the idea of authoritarian power.


Methodology

The study employs a formal analysis approach, focusing on the intrinsic elements of the text, including language, structure, and stylistic devices. It uses a qualitative research design centered on textual analysis, examining the poem's language, structure, and symbols. The population is limited to Percy Bysshe Shelley's sonnet 'Ozymandias', and the instrument is the text itself, analyzed through close reading to identify and interpret irony, imagery, symbolism, and structure.

Methodology Flowchart
                        graph TD;
    A["Start: Identify Poem 'Ozymandias'"] --> B["Apply Formal Analysis Framework"];
    B --> C["Examine Literary Devices"];
    C --> C1["Analyze Irony"];
    C --> C2["Analyze Imagery"];
    C --> C3["Analyze Symbolism"];
    C --> C4["Analyze Structure"];
    C1 & C2 & C3 & C4 --> D["Interpret Thematic Development"];
    D --> E["Evaluate Critique of Authoritarian Power"];
    E --> F["Assess Themes of Impermanence and Ambition"];
    F --> G["Synthesize Findings"];
    G --> H["Formulate Conclusion"];
    H --> I["End"];                    

Discussion

The paper argues that Shelley's formal analysis of 'Ozymandias' reveals how literary devices underscore the transient nature of power and the limitations of human ambition. The poem critiques authoritarianism by contrasting the ruler's boastful inscription with the surrounding ruin, emphasizing nature's and time's ultimate dominance. The study also explores the role of art in preserving human experience, suggesting that while empires fall, artistic representations can endure.


Key Findings

Shelley uses irony, imagery, and symbolism to critique the arrogance of rulers and the impermanence of power. The fragmented statue and desolate landscape serve as potent symbols of decay and the futility of human ambition. The inscription on the pedestal, intended to inspire awe, ironically highlights the ruler's fallen state. The sculptor's depiction of Ozymandias's "sneer of cold command" endures, suggesting art's potential for a lasting legacy beyond political power.


Conclusion

Percy Bysshe Shelley's 'Ozymandias' serves as a timeless critique of hubris and the illusion of eternal dominance. Through irony, imagery, and symbolism, the poem effectively communicates the impermanence of power and legacy, demonstrating that human creations are ultimately subject to the unyielding forces of nature and history. The poem highlights the futility of aspiring for immortality through monuments or assertions of dominance, offering a profound reflection on the fleeting nature of human accomplishments.


Fact Check

1. Publication Year of 'Ozymandias': The text states the poem was composed in 1817 and published in 1818. This is historically accurate.
2. Ozymandias as Ramesses II: The text identifies Ozymandias as the Greek name for Ramesses II. This is a widely accepted historical identification.
3. Poem Structure: The text refers to 'Ozymandias' as a sonnet. The poem is indeed a sonnet, typically structured as a Petrarchan sonnet.


Mind Map

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...