DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.
Title: Downside Risk and VAR-Based optimal Portfolio Including Corporate Bonds and CDS
Authors: Sadaf Mustafa, Naveed Raza
Journal: Journal of Business and Management Research (JBMR)
Publisher: GO GREEN RESEARCH AND EDUCATION
Country: Pakistan
Year: 2024
Volume: 3
Issue: 1
Language: English
This study examines the risk management characteristics, to seek diversification and hedging benefits of investment portfolio for pair of 5-year industrial corporate bonds and CDS of same industry, different techniques; VaR Reduction, expected shortfall reduction, semi VaR Reduction and Regret Reduction is applied on 3 types of portfolio strategies, i.e.  Risk minimization strategy portfolio (P2), Variance minimization portfolio strategy (P3), equally weighted Portfolio strategy (P4). The dataset used in this study comprises of daily closing quotations of 9 US industry’s bond return indices and their analogous 5-year industry’s CDS spread index. The industries included in the analysis are Energy, Industrials, Utility, Health, Telecommunications, Utilities, Banks, Information and Technology (Infotech) and Leisure. Thomson Reuters DataStream is the source for all data of markets. The results indicate that Risk reduction benefit is negative for all the industries for pair of their corporate bonds and respective CDS is negative for both P2 (Risk minimization portfolio) and P4 (equally weighted Portfolio), which makes them less attractive for portfolio diversification and unable to reduce downside risk for investment portfolios in which both of these pairs are included simultaneously.
To examine the risk management characteristics, diversification, and hedging benefits of investment portfolios by combining 5-year industrial corporate bonds and Credit Default Swaps (CDS) of the same industry, using various risk reduction techniques.
The study employed three portfolio strategies: Risk minimization portfolio (P2), Variance minimization portfolio (P3), and Equally weighted portfolio (P4). Daily closing quotations of 9 US industry's bond return indices and their analogous 5-year industry's CDS spread indices were used. Industries included: Energy, Industrials, Utility, Health, Telecommunications, Utilities, Banks, Information and Technology (Infotech), and Leisure. Data was sourced from Thomson Reuters DataStream. Risk and downside risk measures, including Value-at-Risk (VaR) Reduction, Expected Shortfall (ES) Reduction, Semi-VaR Reduction, and Regret Reduction, were applied.
graph TD
A["Data Collection: Daily bond and CDS indices for 9 industries"] --> B["Portfolio Strategy Selection"];
B --> C["Risk Minimization P2"];
B --> D["Variance Minimization P3"];
B --> E["Equally Weighted P4"];
C --> F["Risk and Downside Risk Measurement"];
D --> F;
E --> F;
F --> G["Analysis of VaR Reduction, ES Reduction, Semi-VaR Reduction, Regret Reduction"];
G --> H["Interpretation of Results"];
H --> I["Conclusion on Diversification and Hedging Benefits"];
The study highlights that while positive correlations between corporate bonds and CDS might indicate that shocks in one instrument affect the other, this relationship can make investment portfolios including both more risky. This suggests that for many industries, combining corporate bonds and their respective CDS is not a viable diversification strategy. The industry-specific nature of these relationships is emphasized, with some industries showing weak or negative correlations that could offer hedging and diversification benefits. The effectiveness of different risk reduction measures varied, with ES reduction showing promise for the risk minimization portfolio.
- For most industries, the correlation between 5-year corporate bonds and CDS returns is positive, with the Leisure industry being an exception (negative correlation).
- Risk reduction benefits were negative for both the Risk minimization portfolio (P2) and the Equally weighted portfolio (P4) across all industries when combining corporate bonds and CDS, making them less attractive for diversification and downside risk reduction.
- The Variance minimization portfolio (P3) showed positive but small numeric values for risk reduction, suggesting it's a better choice for safeguarding against downside risk compared to P2 and P4.
- Expected Shortfall (ES) reduction showed positive and significant values for the Risk minimization strategy portfolio (P2) across all industries, indicating it's a good option for mitigating downside and expected shortfall risk.
- It is generally not practical to diversify an investment portfolio and safeguard against downside credit risk by simultaneously adding both 5-year industry-wise corporate bonds and their respective CDS, with some exceptions noted in expected shortfall reduction.
The correlation between corporate bonds and CDS is industry-specific. For most industries, positive correlations between corporate bonds and their respective CDS make their simultaneous inclusion in investment portfolios risky and not ideal for diversification. Investors seeking to reduce portfolio risk through diversification should consider other options. The Variance minimization portfolio (P3) and Expected Shortfall reduction for the Risk minimization portfolio (P2) show some potential for downside risk management.
- The study analyzed 9 US industries: Energy, Industrials, Utility, Health, Telecommunications, Utilities, Banks, Information and Technology (Infotech), and Leisure. (Confirmed by text)
- The correlation for the Leisure industry between corporate bonds and CDS was negative with a value of -0.0361. (Confirmed by text)
- The Variance minimization portfolio (P3) showed positive risk reduction benefits, though with smaller numeric values. (Confirmed by text)
Loading PDF...
Loading Statistics...