DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Enhancing sustainability of university-based outreach activities through participatory action research: the case of Sokoine University of Agriculture


Article Information

Title: Enhancing sustainability of university-based outreach activities through participatory action research: the case of Sokoine University of Agriculture

Authors: Innocent M. Busindeli, Respikius Martin, Vituce J. Kalungwizi

Journal: International Journal of Agricultural Extension (IJAE)

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31
Y 2023-07-01 2024-09-30
Y 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
Y 2020-07-01 2021-06-30

Publisher: DATAPLUS (SMC- Private) Limited

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2024

Volume: 12

Issue: 2

Language: English

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.012.002.5153

Keywords: Participatory action researchRural transformationSustainabilityUniversity-based-outreach activities

Categories

Abstract

Universities worldwide are mandated for training, research, consultancy and outreach. To ensure that they are responsive to community’s needs, as part of corporate social responsibility, Universities carry out outreach activities and engage with rural communities. However, many universities' outreach activities in rural communities face the challenge of sustainability. In addressing sustainability, Participatory Action Research (PAR) has proved to foster collaboration and meaningful engagements for community transformation. This is because using PAR to seek solutions to problems facing society and, simultaneously, meeting outreach goals fosters sustainability. In this paper, we use the Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) as a case to report findings on achievements, challenges and critical lessons learned from selected outreach projects that used PAR interventional strategy. We collected primary data from community members based on our involvement in selected projects. We employed focus group discussions (FGDs) to collect primary data. These data were compiled and shared during feedback meetings and dialogue conferences. In addition, secondary data collected include information obtained from literature review, project reports and researchers’ field notes. Data were analyzed by thematic analysis procedure. Our experiences and results indicate that PAR interventional strategy sustained the University’s outreach activities, enhanced the University-community linkage and transformed rural communities in different ways, ranging from individual, economic and organisational empowerment. In addition, PAR fostered researcher-farmer interactions and collaboration among partners and actors. Critical lessons learned include long-term commitment to work with rural communities is necessary to build mutual trust and strong partnerships; communities perceive researchers as “outsiders” who have abilities and resources for addressing their felt needs and problems and PAR is limited by institutional set-up. However, frequent interactions and close involvement of stakeholders in project implementation guaranteed success.


Research Objective

To analyze and report on the achievements, challenges, and critical lessons learned from using Participatory Action Research (PAR) as an interventional strategy in selected outreach projects at Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), with the aim of enhancing the sustainability of these activities and fostering rural transformation.


Methodology

The study is a case study of Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) focusing on two outreach projects: the "Uluguru Mountains Agricultural Development Programme (UMADEP)" and the "Innovative Communication Pathways in Dissemination of Agricultural Technologies and Improving Market Information in Tomato Value Chain" project. The research was anchored in the PAR framework, involving cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Data was collected through a combination of primary and secondary sources. Primary data included eight focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members and information from dialogue conferences. Secondary data was gathered from literature reviews, project reports, and researchers' field notes. The collected data were analyzed using a thematic analysis procedure.

Methodology Flowchart
                        graph TD;
    A[Case Study Selection: SUA Outreach Projects] --> B[Data Collection];
    B --> C[Primary Data: Focus Group Discussions & Dialogue Conferences];
    B --> D[Secondary Data: Project Reports & Literature Review];
    C --> E[Data Analysis];
    D --> E[Data Analysis];
    E --> F[Thematic Analysis based on PAR Cycles];
    F --> G[Identification of Achievements];
    F --> H[Identification of Challenges];
    F --> I[Identification of Critical Lessons];
    G --> J[Conclusions & Recommendations];
    H --> J;
    I --> J;                    

Discussion

The paper argues that PAR is a valuable bottom-up strategy for making university outreach sustainable and responsive to community needs. The cyclic process of PAR allowed for continuous learning and adaptation, enabling projects to address emergent challenges, such as marketing issues that arose after production increased. The use of participatory tools like Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), feedback meetings, and farmer groups was central to co-developing and implementing action plans. The study emphasizes that long-term commitment and mutual trust between the university and communities are essential for the success of PAR initiatives. However, challenges such as power dynamics within groups and community dependency on external support must be carefully managed.


Key Findings

- The Participatory Action Research (PAR) strategy effectively sustained the university's outreach activities and strengthened the university-community linkage.
- PAR contributed to the transformation of rural communities through individual, economic (e.g., increased women's income), and organizational empowerment.
- The approach fostered strong collaboration between researchers and farmers, as well as among other project partners and actors.
- Key challenges identified include the time-consuming nature of PAR, institutional limitations in resource allocation, and a tendency for communities to perceive researchers as "outsiders" with resources to solve all their problems.
- Frequent interaction and close involvement of all stakeholders were critical for project success and overcoming challenges.


Conclusion

Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a useful and relevant interventional strategy for sustaining university outreach activities and promoting community transformation. The success of this approach relies on the long-term commitment of both the university and the community to work collaboratively. For PAR to be effective, universities must prioritize and commit sufficient time and resources to their outreach programs. The study demonstrates that PAR can successfully build sustainable linkages between academic institutions and rural communities for technology generation and dissemination.


Fact Check

1. The "Uluguru Mountains Agricultural Development Programme (UMADEP)" was implemented in the Morogoro region from 1993 to 2020. This is stated in the Methodology section.
2. An end-of-project evaluation by Intermon Oxfam (2010) showed that the percentage of women earning over TShs 500,000 increased from 1.2% at the project's start to 7.8% at its end. This is reported in the Results and Discussion section.
3. A total of 382 farm families were keeping 1,538 Norwegian dairy goats in three wards of the Mgeta division as a result of project interventions. This is mentioned in the Results and Discussion section.


Mind Map

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...