DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Nose dorsum augmentation with diced cartilage graft versus Block cartilage graft in mild saddle nose.


Article Information

Title: Nose dorsum augmentation with diced cartilage graft versus Block cartilage graft in mild saddle nose.

Authors: Hassan Tahir, Muhammad Adil Iqbal, Shehab Afzal Beg, Osama Ahmed Qureshi, Touqeer Hussain, Remsha Sattar

Journal: The Professional Medical Journal (TPMJ)

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31
Y 2023-07-01 2024-09-30
Y 2022-07-01 2023-06-30
Y 2021-07-01 2022-06-30

Publisher: Independent Medical College, Faisalabad- Pakistan

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2023

Volume: 30

Issue: 8

Language: English

DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/2023.30.08.7072

Keywords: RhinoplastySaddle noseBlock CartilageDiced Cartilage

Categories

Abstract

Objective: To compare the aesthetic results of diced cartilage and block cartilage when they both use for nose dorsum augmentation in mild saddle nose deformity. Study Design: Retrospective Comparative study. Setting: Department of Plastic Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi. Period: January 2017 to December 2019. Material & Methods: Two groups selected for this procedure diced graft (n=11) and segment cartilage graft (n=13), total 24 patient. Retrospective data of these patient were analyze, aesthetic outcome recorded as fair, good and excellent on remark of two plastic surgeon (blinded to graft placed) not involve in surgery by pre and postoperative picture at last follow up  and patient satisfaction via S-VAS recorded. Average follow up was 6 month. Results: Aesthetic outcome of dice cartilage graft versus block cartilage graft are excellent in 81.8% versus 76.9 %, good 9% versus 7.6%, fair 9% versus 15% respectively. Patient satisfaction grade extremely satisfied 72.7% versus 69.2%, satisfied 27.2% versus 30.7%, no patient was unsatisfied. Conclusion: Our clinical experience support that the free diced cartilage graft technique presents an effective and easily reproducible method for nose dorsum augmentation in aesthetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty for mild saddle deformity.


Research Objective

To compare the aesthetic results of diced cartilage and block cartilage when used for nose dorsum augmentation in mild saddle nose deformity.


Methodology

Retrospective comparative study conducted at the Department of Plastic Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from January 2017 to December 2019. Two groups were selected: diced graft (n=11) and segment cartilage graft (n=13), totaling 24 patients. Retrospective data analysis included aesthetic outcomes rated as fair, good, and excellent based on pre- and postoperative pictures assessed by two blinded plastic surgeons, and patient satisfaction via S-VAS. Average follow-up was 6 months.

Methodology Flowchart
                        graph TD;
    A["Patient Selection Mild Saddle Nose"] --> B["Divide into Groups"];
    B --> C["Group A: Block Cartilage Graft n=13"];
    B --> D["Group B: Diced Cartilage Graft n=11"];
    C --> E["Perform Open Rhinoplasty"];
    D --> E;
    E --> F["Postoperative Care & Splinting"];
    F --> G["Follow-up Average 6 Months"];
    G --> H["Data Collection: Aesthetic Outcome & Patient Satisfaction"];
    H --> I["Analysis by Blinded Surgeons & S-VAS"];
    I --> J["Statistical Analysis"];
    J --> K["Compare Aesthetic Results & Satisfaction"];
    K --> L["Conclusion on Graft Technique Efficacy"];                    

Discussion

The study suggests the superiority of diced cartilage grafts for dorsal augmentation in patients with mild saddle nose, showing better overall outcomes and satisfaction rates compared to block cartilage grafts. The diced technique offers greater flexibility for minor adjustments and correction of deviations.


Key Findings

Aesthetic outcomes for diced cartilage graft were excellent in 81.8% versus 76.9% for block cartilage graft. Patient satisfaction was extremely satisfied in 72.7% for diced cartilage versus 69.2% for block cartilage. The diced cartilage graft technique showed a significantly higher satisfaction rate (p=0.031).


Conclusion

The free diced cartilage graft technique is an effective and easily reproducible method for nose dorsum augmentation in aesthetic and reconstructive rhinoplasty for mild saddle deformity, leading to higher patient satisfaction.


Fact Check

1. The study included a total of 24 patients. (Confirmed: 11 in diced group + 13 in block group = 24)
2. The study period was from January 2017 to December 2019. (Confirmed)
3. A p-value of 0.031 was found to be significant, indicating a high satisfaction rate in the diced cartilage group. (Confirmed)


Mind Map

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...