DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.
Title: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;: Early vs delayed acute cholecystitis
Authors: MOHAMMAD ADNAN NAZEER, HASAAN IMTIAZ, HARUN MAJID DAR, Zulfiqar Ali, Asma Samreen
Journal: The Professional Medical Journal (TPMJ)
Publisher: Independent Medical College, Faisalabad- Pakistan
Country: Pakistan
Year: 2013
Volume: 20
Issue: 2
Language: English
DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/2013.20.02.689
Keywords: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy,early cholecystectomydelayed cholecystectomy
Introduction: The role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis is still controversial. Objective:The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy foracute cholecystitis and to compare the results with delayed cholecystectomy. Setting: Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Period: 1st Feb,2012 to 31st July 2012. Materials & Methods: 60 diagnosed patients of acute cholecystitis were randomly allocated to two groups,Group 1 underwent early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Group 1, n = 30) and Group 2 to initial conservative treatment followed bydelayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 6 to 12 weeks later (Group 2 , n = 30). Results: The overall complication rate was 3.3% (01) inearly group and 16.7% (05) in the delayed group. There was no common bile duct injury in both groups. The complications includedwound infection and intraperitoneal collection. Conclusions: According to the results our study we concluded that early laparoscopiccholecystectomy can safely be carried out for acute cholecystitis as the complications for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy are lessas compared to delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy has also an edge over delayed because ofsingle hospital stay.
Loading PDF...
Loading Statistics...