DefinePK

Research Objective

To assess the attitudes, practices, and barriers regarding rubber dam usage among young dentists in Pakistan.

Methodology

A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 78 dentists who graduated within the last five years. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to gather data on demographic details, knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward rubber dam use. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 with descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Logistic regression identified predictors of rubber dam use.

Methodology Flowchart

                        graph TD
    A[Define Research Objective] --> B[Develop Questionnaire];
    B --> C[Recruit Participants78 Young Dentists];
    C --> D[Administer Questionnaire];
    D --> E[Data Entry into SPSS v27];
    E --> F[Descriptive Statistics];
    E --> G[Chi-Square Tests];
    E --> H[Logistic Regression];
    F --> I[Analyze Results];
    G --> I;
    H --> I;
    I --> J[Formulate Conclusions and Recommendations];                    

Discussion

Despite the recognized clinical benefits of rubber dams, their adoption among young dentists in Pakistan is suboptimal. Key barriers include the unavailability of kits, time constraints, and perceived lack of skills. While dentists acknowledge the importance of isolation, practical implementation is limited. Patient compliance and response also play a significant role in the decision to use rubber dams. Addressing these logistical and educational challenges is crucial for improving adoption rates.

Key Findings

- 59.5% of young dentists reported using rubber dams, with only 15.4% using them frequently.
- The primary barrier to use was the unavailability of kits (48%).
- Better isolation was the primary perceived benefit (93.3%).
- Patient compliance was reported as high by 59% of respondents.
- Positive patient response was a significant predictor of rubber dam usage (odds ratio = 13.32).

Conclusion

Rubber dam usage among young dentists in Pakistan is limited due to various barriers, including kit availability and patient compliance. Targeted interventions, such as improving kit accessibility, enhancing training, and educating patients on the benefits, are recommended to increase the adoption of rubber dams, thereby improving clinical outcomes and patient safety.

Fact Check

- 59.5% of participants used rubber dams. (Confirmed in Results)
- Unavailability of kits was the primary barrier for non-users at 48%. (Confirmed in Results)
- Positive patient response was a significant predictor of rubber dam usage with an odds ratio of 13.32. (Confirmed in Results)

Mind Map