DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

منکرین حدیث اور مستشرقین کے شبہات میں مماثلت کی صورتیں:


Article Information

Title: منکرین حدیث اور مستشرقین کے شبہات میں مماثلت کی صورتیں:

Authors: Abdul Waheed Farooqi, Maryam Saddiqa, Hafiz Abdul Hameed

Journal: Tanazur

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31
Y 2023-07-01 2024-09-30

Publisher: Institute of Regional Research And Perspectives (SME- Private) Limited

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2024

Volume: 5

Issue: 3

Language: Urdu

Keywords: HadithOrientalistsArgumentssimilaritiesConverging CriticismsHadith Rejectors

Categories

Abstract

Those who deny the hadith or are orientalists, ignore the hadiths that contain any doubts, or that any similar doubts have come. Similarities include theories or common objections, jokes on the outside of your card. Here are some similar similarities to the following: This is a literal slur and a religious hadith It is independent and cannot be taken from the Qur’an, as opposed to a false or unnecessary decision. This is a questionable hadith, or an Islamic law, which is subject to adoption and can be accepted. Orientalists have many historical hadiths where there is a question about whether or not there is any invention or political information that is the reason behind this How to write down or send a voice message, why there is a distortion, an invention, or a comprehensive mistake. This is the most important point in objecting to the hadiths of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, and there is another turn after the narrator’s pretext is copied Yes, if there is any questionable statement or hadith, the chain of transmission is undocumented or untrue or untrue or narrator. There are no doubts and doubts on the appearance of your card. It is a hadith that has been narrated and has reliable narrators and that no card is accepted. And in this hadith, the narrator, the trustworthy narrators, the story or the imagination, the story of the story of a trustworthy narrator. Political or sectarian statements, such as under the hadiths, placing a karna in order to encourage this, some of the hadiths, which are contradictory or unreasonable. Reply to your card There is a clear proof of this, the Glorious and Sufficient Qur’an, or a hadith, which is necessary, and in the most important way, the hadiths of the Prophet, or some of the narrations And reason or historical facts that contradict the decision of the date and the hadiths that follow the sound of what you are talking about. A detailed guide to Islamic principles, instructions on how to use your card after the jurisprudence, Psychological or political situations, such as the beginning of the Islamic hadiths, the history of which comes after the Islamic history, the results of the course , especially the development of Per Abbasi’s intellectual, political or intellectual role in the conflict between the Qur’an and Hadith. Imagine the evidence of the hadith of the Qur’an, as the Qur’an has become clear, and the text of the Qur’an has become clear. This is a hadith that is related to the truth or is doubtful, or at times, its theory, what is the matter, a hadith of the Qur’an, and some jurisprudential or legal benefits that it serves This is a political or political decision. Doctrinal meanings, meanings, meanings, meanings, meanings, meanings. And there are doubtful hadiths or sectarian decisions or differences in the face of these hadiths. To change whether there are deniers of hadith or orientalists, any similar suspicions exist, let it be There is no difference between intent and objectives. Deniers of a general hadith developed in an internal Islamic context, similar to hadiths that were rejected by orientalists, hadiths that were historical or culturally similar to that Don't save your card.


Research Objective

To identify and analyze the similarities in the arguments and criticisms presented by Hadith rejectors and Orientalists regarding the authenticity and validity of Hadith.


Methodology

The study appears to be a comparative analysis of scholarly arguments and historical critiques of Hadith. It draws upon existing literature and scholarly opinions from both Hadith rejectors and Orientalist scholars to identify common themes and objections.

Methodology Flowchart
                        graph TD
    A["Identify Criticisms of Hadith Rejectors"] --> B["Identify Criticisms of Orientalists"]
    B --> C["Compare and Analyze Similarities"]
    C --> D["Document Converging Arguments"]
    D --> E["Formulate Conclusion on Shared Critical Stance"]                    

Discussion

The paper argues that despite originating from different contexts, Hadith rejectors and Orientalists converge on similar critical approaches to Hadith. This convergence is attributed to shared concerns about the historical development, compilation, and potential biases within Hadith literature. The study highlights how both groups question the literal interpretation of Hadith and its independence from the Quran.


Key Findings

Both Hadith rejectors and Orientalists tend to question Hadith based on perceived doubts, potential for fabrication, political influence, and contradictions with the Quran or historical facts. They often scrutinize the chain of transmission (Isnad) and the reliability of narrators.


Conclusion

The study concludes that there are significant overlaps in the criticisms leveled against Hadith by both Hadith rejectors and Orientalists. This shared critical stance suggests a common intellectual ground in questioning the uncritical acceptance of Hadith, emphasizing the need for rigorous scrutiny and contextual understanding.


Fact Check

1. Publication Date: The article was published on 14/10/2024. (Confirmed by text)
2. Journal Volume and Issue: The article is published in TANAZUR, Vol. 05, No. 03. (Confirmed by text)
3. Page Numbers: The article spans pages 635-654. (Confirmed by text)


Mind Map

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...