DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Development of Doctrine of Frustration: Departure from Absolutism in Contracts


Article Information

Title: Development of Doctrine of Frustration: Departure from Absolutism in Contracts

Authors: Hafiz Muhammad Usman Nawaz, Mirza Shahid Rizwan Baig, Dr. Rao Qasim Idrees

Journal: Journal of Peace, Development and Communication

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2023-07-01 2024-09-30
Y 2022-07-01 2023-06-30
Y 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
Y 2020-07-01 2021-06-30

Publisher: Peace and Development Foundation

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2020

Volume: 4

Issue: 3

Language: en

Keywords: PerformanceFrustrationAbsolutismImpossibility

Categories

Abstract

Absolute liability in contracts or absolutism is traced back to seventeenth century. The famous case of Paradine v Jane (1647) laid down the basic rule of absolute liability in contracts. The rule stated that contracting parties are bound to fulfill their promises irrespective of circumstances. This case is considered as an authority in absolute liability in contracts. In order to excuse the party not performing his contractual obligations due to no fault on his part, doctrine of frustration of contract was developed. Taylor v Caldwell (1863) is generally considered a turning point in the application of absolute liability in contracts. It provided a new avenue for discharge of contracts on the ground of supervening impossibility. This article deals with the factors responsible for the development of doctrine of frustration of contract. Especially case laws will be discussed which had changed the doctrine of absolute liability in the performance of contracts and this new doctrine has been emerged.


Paper summary is not available for this article yet.

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...