DefinePK

Abstract

In an increasingly globalized world, cross-border commercial activities have surged, accompanied by a corresponding rise in international disputes. Traditional litigation, often perceived as costly, time-consuming, and complex in terms of jurisdiction, has prompted stakeholders to seek more efficient mechanisms, such as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). This paper explores the evolving domain of cross-border ADR, highlighting both its promising potential and its inherent complexities. Key opportunities include enhanced cost-effectiveness, faster resolution, greater flexibility, preservation of business relationships, and enforceability of arbitral awards under instruments such as the New York Convention. Online ADR further democratizes access to dispute resolution across jurisdictions. However, cross-border ADR is not without challenges. These include jurisdictional conflicts, enforcement difficulties, cultural and linguistic barriers, ethical concerns, and technological security issues in OADR platforms. Through real-world case studies, literature from authoritative sources, and legal analysis, this research aims to provide a balanced understanding of the promise and pitfalls of cross-border ADR. It also identifies gaps in existing scholarship and offers forward-looking recommendations for improving ADR frameworks in a transnational context.