DefinePK

Abstract

Suicide research in culturally sensitive settings such as rural Pakistan faces methodological and ethical obstacles that surpass conventional Western qualitative paradigms. Influenced by Islamic doctrine, pervasive mental-health stigma, and collectivist family systems, these contexts render Western methodologies ineffective at eliciting genuine engagement or nuanced understanding of suicidal ideation. To address these barriers, we implemented five interlocking innovations over three months with forty-five youth survivors in the Bhakkar District: co-designed bilingual Urdu/Saraiki interview guides enriched with local metaphors and spiritual lexicon; a community elder–mediated recruitment model securing trust and moral endorsement; participant-driven control of interview venues, pacing, and support persons; an iterative, staged consent process harmonizing Western ethical standards with collectivist decision-making; and a hybrid analytic approach blending thematic coding with Islamic spiritual exegesis, validated by community panels. This strategy yielded an 89% initial recruitment rate (versus 23% under direct recruitment), a 94% retention rate, 91% of interviews rated “rich” or “very rich,” 92% satisfaction with interview settings, 96% comfort with consent procedures, zero adverse events, and full community endorsement. Although resource-intensive, these methods produced authentic, actionable insights for locally resonant prevention strategies and can serve as a global model for bridging Western norms and non-Western realities.
Keywords: Suicide risk; academic stress; cultural adaptation; rural Pakistan; ethical innovation; qualitative methods