DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.
Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT ROOF COMBINATIONS IN PAKISTAN HEAT CONDUCTION RATE AND COST ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT ROOF MATERIALS IN PAKISTAN
Authors: Sadam Hussain Rajput, Faheem Ahmed Solangi, Aisha Hafeez, Rao Muhammad Haseeb, Sadam Hussain, Noman Hussain
Journal: Spectrum of Engineering Sciences
| Category | From | To |
|---|---|---|
| Y | 2024-10-01 | 2025-12-31 |
Publisher: Sociology Educational Nexus Research Institute
Country: Pakistan
Year: 2025
Volume: 3
Issue: 5
Language: en
Keywords: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT ROOF COMBINATIONSPAKISTAN HEAT CONDUCTION RATECOST ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT ROOF MATERIALS
Building cooling and heating consumes a sizable fraction of the total global energy, therefore, the energy efficient building is a dire need to save a significant amount of electricity consumption. A roof is the element of building which is exposed to solar radiations directly, therefore, dissipation through roofs is higher.  In present era, roof is built from  reinforced cement concrete (RCC) because of satisfactory mechanical properties of RCC. Although, heat conductivity of RCC is higher which gives rise to transmission of heat through the rooftops composed of RCC, to resist this heat an RCC roof is insulated with Marble and Polyurethanes in Pakistan. In this study, equivalent thermal conductivities, temperature reduction ability, heat transfer rates and overall cost of three roof combinations have been analysed. The hot plate guarded method and Fourier law was employed to determine thermal conductivity of distict roofing materials, and heat transfer rates through roof combinations. The construction cost and energy saving cost of each roof combination were found through market survey and Hourly Analysis Program (HAP).  The experimental outcomes proved that the rate of heat conduction declined by 8.1% and 84.2% with combination B (RCC insulated with marble) and C (RCC lined with marble and polyurethane), respectively, in contrast to an RCC roof. The construction expenditure of combinations B and C has been enhanced by 15.7 % and 22.5 %, respectively, additionally, energy saving cost of roof combinations B was 73 PKR and energy saving cost of C was 364 PKR.  Finally, the temperature reduction capability of roofs A, B, and C in degree centigrade (°C)  were 5.70, 6.58, and 11.94, correspondingly. However, combination C proved to be efficient heat insulation roof. The study was conducted to determine suitable insulation material for  an RCC roof and its influence on over all  cost and heat dissipation.
Loading PDF...
Loading Statistics...