DefinePK

Abstract

Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a critical diagnostic tool, but its safety protocols require strict adherence to prevent adverse outcomes. This study evaluates the knowledge and perception of MRI safety among clinicians at Mardan Medical Complex Hospital, identifying gaps and areas for improvement in safety protocol implementation and understanding.
Methods and Materials: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 218 clinicians, including pediatricians (22.0%), gynecologists (20.2%), orthopedic surgeons (8.7%), neurologists (8.3%), and urologists (9.6%). Data collection utilized a structured questionnaire assessing knowledge of MRI safety principles, adherence to protocols, and perception of safety practices. Statistical analysis employed Chi-square tests and Fisher Freeman Halton Exact Test to evaluate interprofessional variations in safety knowledge and protocol adherence.
Results: While 93.6% of clinicians recognized MRI as a non-invasive diagnostic tool and 97.2% acknowledged the importance of removing metallic objects, significant gaps emerged in specialized safety knowledge. Only 27.1% demonstrated awareness of tattoo pigment risks, and 47.2% understood transdermal patch removal requirements. Pregnancy-related safety protocols showed moderate implementation (69.3% for pregnant patients), with only 37.6% reporting post-exposure fetal monitoring. Significant interprofessional variations were observed in implanted device safety knowledge (pediatrics: 89.6%, neurology: 33.3%, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The study reveals substantial variations in MRI safety knowledge and protocol adherence across specialties, emphasizing the need for standardized training programs and comprehensive institutional guidelines. Implementation of specialty-specific educational interventions and unified safety protocols is crucial for enhancing patient safety in MRI procedures.