DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Evaluating the effectiveness of radiological anatomy course in a module of undergraduate medical curriculum


Article Information

Title: Evaluating the effectiveness of radiological anatomy course in a module of undergraduate medical curriculum

Authors: Naila Nadeem, Ambreen Surti, Azam Afzal, Mariyah Hidayat

Journal: Pakistan Journal of Medical & Cardiological Review (PJMS)

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31

Publisher: Intellect Educational Research Explorers

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2025

Volume: 41

Issue: 10

Language: en

DOI: 10.12669/pjms.41.10.12623

Keywords: Multiple choice questionsCurriculum integrationMBBS curriculumRadiological anatomy

Categories

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a Radiological Anatomy Module in the undergraduate MBBS curriculum
Methodology: An experimental pre- and post-test study was conducted over a ten weeks period, from September 23, 2024 to December 2, 2024, at the University College of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lahore. A total of 144 second year MBBS students were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. Both groups received equal teaching hours and were taught by the same trained facilitators using identical instructional methods-lectures, small group discussions, applied clinical scenarios and dissection. In addition, the experimental group was taught how to identify anatomical structures on radiological images, which were integrated into all teaching sessions. Assessments comprised 30 MCQs per module, validated by subject experts and subjected to item analysis. Student feedback was gathered through a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with paired and independent t-tests applied (p < 0.05).
Results: The experimental group demonstrated significantly higher post-test scores compared to the control group in both the Abdomen (20.5 ± 1.12 vs. 14.05 ± 1.53; p < 0.001) and Pelvis modules (23.7 ± 2.39 vs. 13.8 ± 1.42; p < 0.001), as determined by independent-sample t-tests. Item analysis confirmed that MCQs were of appropriate difficulty and discrimination, with acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.61 for Abdomen, 0.59 for Pelvis). Feedback responses also indicated greater engagement, motivation and overall satisfaction among the experimental group (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Teaching abdominal and pelvic anatomy through the lens of radiology significantly improves understanding, reinforces clinical relevance and enhances student engagement.


Paper summary is not available for this article yet.

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...