DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Scopus Delisting Process Behind Closed Doors: A Case Study of Nurture


Article Information

Title: Scopus Delisting Process Behind Closed Doors: A Case Study of Nurture

Authors: Sadie Ahmad

Journal: Nurture

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2021-07-01 2022-06-30
Y 2020-07-01 2021-06-30

Publisher: Pakistan Home Economics Association

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2025

Volume: 19

Issue: 2

Language: en

DOI: 10.55951/nurture.v19i2.1006

Keywords: NurtureScopusCSABUnethical delisting

Categories

Abstract

The journal Nurture (Online ISSN: 1994-1633), which publishes peer-reviewed research in the social sciences was removed from the Scopus database after a re-evaluation by the Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board (CSAB). This article carefully explains what happened before and after the delisting, and examines whether Scopus followed its own guidelines during the review. It highlights how the reasons given by the CSAB do not match the rules and benchmarks published by Scopus. It also questions the fairness and professionalism of the CSAB and the review process. Most importantly, this article argues that the Scopus team made an unethical decision. The way they evaluated Nurture was not only unfair but also biased against journals from developing countries. The article calls for more transparency, fair practices, and accountability in the way global academic indexing platforms make decisions.


Paper summary is not available for this article yet.

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...