DefinePK

DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.

Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration using Regionally Calibrated Hargreaves-Samani Equation


Article Information

Title: Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration using Regionally Calibrated Hargreaves-Samani Equation

Authors: Mamoon ur Rasheed

Journal: International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology

HEC Recognition History
Category From To
Y 2024-10-01 2025-12-31
Y 2023-07-01 2024-09-30
Y 2021-07-01 2022-06-30

Publisher: 50SEA JOURNALS (SMC-PRIVATE) LIMITED

Country: Pakistan

Year: 2022

Volume: 4

Issue: Special Issue

Language: English

Keywords: Reference Evapotranspiration (ETO)Hargreaves-SamaniShuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and Landsat 8

Categories

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ETO) is a significant module in water-balance, irrigation scheduling and estimation of crop water requirement models. ETO can be adequately assessed when meteorological data are accessible to implement robust and strong models such as FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM). However, due to data insufficiency, substitute methodologies are essential. In this context, this study aims to calculate ETO from regionally calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HSCAL), Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and Hargreaves methods which base on Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Solar Radiation (SR). SR was calculated from empirical formulas and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 30m Digital Elevation Model (DEM). HSCAL uses SR which calculated from empirical formulas as an input, whereas HS and Hargreaves uses SR which calculated from the SRTM 30m DEM. LST was calculated from Landsat8 (LS8) thermal band for all three methods. Furthermore, ETO obtained from the HSCAL (ETO,HSCAL) was compared with standard FAO-ETO values and after verification HSCAL treated as standard for the verification of the remaining two methods on various Land Use Land Cover (LULC) types. Results of comparison between ETO,HSCAL and standard FAO-ETO shows that mostly values are within the range but lower side. Comparison also disclose that vegetation and built-up LULC are the best and worst case respectively. Further, ETO,HSCAL values are mostly fall within lower class of the ranges during the monsoon season (August-September). Further, the performance of the HS and Hargreaves are evaluated based on statistical indicators; Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Bias Error (MBE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Correlation Coefficient (R2). ETO values of HS (ETO,HS) and Hargreaves (ETO,H) are underestimated in the sami-arid climate zone. The mean values of all statistical indicators are lower for ETO,HS in comparison to ETO,H when ETO,HSCAL is used to compare ETO,H with ETO,HS. It indicates that, in comparison to ETO,H, ETO,HS is close to ETO,HSCAL.


Research Objective

To estimate and verify Reference Evapotranspiration (ETO) values on multiple Land Use Land Cover (LULC) types using three different versions of the Hargreaves equation, and to calculate Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Solar Radiation (SR) using satellite data and empirical formulas.


Methodology

The study utilized three methods for estimating ETO: Hargreaves-Samani Calibrated (HSCAL), Hargreaves-Samani (HS), and Hargreaves. Solar Radiation (SR) was calculated using empirical formulas and the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 30m Digital Elevation Model (DEM). Land Surface Temperature (LST) was derived from Landsat 8 thermal band data. The HSCAL method used SR calculated from empirical formulas, while HS and Hargreaves used SR calculated from SRTM 30m DEM. ETO obtained from HSCAL was compared with standard FAO-ETO values and then used as a standard for verifying the other two methods across various LULC types. Statistical indicators such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Bias Error (MBE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Correlation Coefficient (R2) were used for evaluation.

Methodology Flowchart
                        graph TD
    A[Acquire Landsat 8 and SRTM DEM Data] --> B[Calculate LST from LS8];
    B --> C[Calculate SR from SRTM DEMfor HS & Hargreaves];
    A --> D[Calculate SR from Empirical Formulasfor HSCAL];
    D --> E[Calibrate Hargreaves-Samani EquationHSCAL];
    C --> F[Apply HS and Hargreaves Equations];
    E --> G[Estimate ETO using HSCAL];
    F --> H[Estimate ETO using HS and Hargreaves];
    G --> I[Compare HSCAL ETO with FAO-ETO];
    H --> J[Compare HS & Hargreaves ETO with HSCAL ETO];
    I --> K[Analyze results by LULC type];
    J --> K;
    K --> L[Evaluate performance using statistical indicatorsRMSE, MBE, MAE, R2];
    L --> M[Draw Conclusions];                    

Discussion

The study highlights the challenge of estimating Reference Evapotranspiration (ETO) when comprehensive meteorological data required for the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (PM) equation is insufficient. The Hargreaves-based methods offer viable alternatives. The regional calibration of the Hargreaves-Samani equation (HSCAL) proved to be a valuable approach for improving ETO estimation accuracy in data-scarce regions. The comparison of HSCAL with FAO-ETO and the subsequent use of HSCAL as a standard for evaluating HS and Hargreaves methods provided insights into their performance under different LULC types and climatic conditions. The underestimation of ETO by HS and Hargreaves methods in the semi-arid climate zone suggests a need for further refinement or consideration of local conditions.


Key Findings

- The regionally calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HSCAL) equation, which uses empirically derived solar radiation, showed values mostly within the range of standard FAO-ETO, though often on the lower side.
- Vegetation LULC was found to be the best case for ETO,CAL values, while built-up LULC was the worst.
- During the monsoon season, ETO,HSCAL values tended to fall into the lower class of ranges.
- Both the Hargreaves and HS equations tended to underestimate ETo in the semi-arid climate zone.
- The HS equation showed better performance (lower RMSE, MBE, MAE) compared to the Hargreaves equation when compared against the HSCAL standard, indicating it is closer to the HSCAL estimates.


Conclusion

In areas lacking comprehensive meteorological data, the regionally calibrated Hargreaves-Samani (HSCAL) equation is recommended for estimating ETO in the Punjab Rice Wheat Agroclimatic Zone (PRW-ACZ). The empirical ETO dataset generated by HSCAL facilitates the assessment of satellite-based ETO data at more locations and under diverse conditions than previously possible. The study confirms that while HS and Hargreaves methods can provide ETO estimates, they tend to underestimate values in semi-arid climates, with HS performing better than Hargreaves.


Fact Check

- The study area is 1121501 hectares.
- Landsat 8 (LS8) thermal band was used to calculate Land Surface Temperature (LST).
- Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 30m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was used for Solar Radiation (SR) calculation in HS and Hargreaves methods.


Mind Map

Loading PDF...

Loading Statistics...