DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.
Title: غزوہ احد کے واقعات میں روایت بالمعنیٰ کا جائزہ
Authors: Ayesha Tariq, Shaista Jabeen
Journal: Al-Ida’at Arabic Research Journal (ALIDAAT)
Publisher: AL-ASR Research Centre (SMC-Private) Limited
Country: Pakistan
Year: 2023
Volume: 3
Issue: 3
Language: Urdu
Keywords: Islamic lawHadithTraditionalistsRiwayet e billafzRiwayet bilmanaTraditionalists Orientalistsanti-Hadith
The Hadith in the sense of the reports of the sayings and doings of the Prophet has been a subject of keen pursuits and constant study by the Muslims throughout the Muslim world since the very beginning of the history of Islam up to the present times. During the lifetime of the Prophet many of his companions tried to get by heart whatever he said and observed keenly whatever he did and they reported these things to one another. 
Hadith is the second main source of Islamic Law, valid forever. Hadith was transmitted in two ways.one is narration by words (Riwayet billafz) and the other is narration in the meaning (Riwayet bilmana). One group of Traditionalists opposes Hadith’s narration in the meaning while the other gives permission with some conditions.
Orientalists have made objection on the narration of Hadith in this way. Side by side the Non-Muslims, one group from our so-called Muslims claim the authenticity of Hadith. The group known as anti-Hadith argues that all Hadith are fabricated, largely in the 3rd century of Islam and the Quran alone is the source of guidance for Muslims. The Traditionalists have cleared the blame in a very sensible mode. The article deals with the above-mentioned issues in detail.
To analyze the occurrences of Ghazwa e Ohad within the context of Hadith narration, addressing objections raised by Orientalists and the anti-Hadith group.
The study involves an analytical approach to Hadith narration, examining different methods of transmission (Riwayet billafz and Riwayet bilmana) and addressing criticisms regarding the authenticity of Hadith.
graph TD;
A[Analysis of Hadith Narration] --> B[Examining Transmission Methods];
B --> C[Addressing Criticisms from Orientalists and Anti-Hadith Groups];
C --> D[Defending Hadith Authenticity by Traditionalists];
D --> E[Focusing on Ghazwa e Ohad Occurrences];
E --> F[Conclusion on Hadith Validity];
The discussion centers on the validity and transmission of Hadith, contrasting the views of Traditionalists with those of Orientalists and the anti-Hadith movement. It highlights the importance of Hadith as the second main source of Islamic Law.
The article aims to detail the issues surrounding Hadith narration, particularly in relation to the Ghazwa e Ohad, and to provide clarifications from the perspective of Traditionalists.
The study concludes by addressing the complexities of Hadith narration and its role in Islamic jurisprudence, particularly in understanding historical events like Ghazwa e Ohad.
1. Hadith is the second main source of Islamic Law. (Confirmed by the text).
2. Two main ways of Hadith transmission are narration by words (Riwayet billafz) and narration in meaning (Riwayet bilmana). (Confirmed by the text).
3. The article deals with issues raised by Orientalists and the anti-Hadith group. (Confirmed by the text).
Loading PDF...
Loading Statistics...