DefinePK hosts the largest index of Pakistani journals, research articles, news headlines, and videos. It also offers chapter-level book search.
Title: Bridging Gaps in Teaching and Learning Biochemistry: A Qualitative Study
Authors: Syed Danish Haseen Ahmed, Ambreen Usmani
Journal: Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (PAFMJ)
Publisher: Army Medical College, Rawalpindi.
Country: Pakistan
Year: 2024
Volume: 74
Issue: 2
Language: English
Keywords: TeachingLearningqualitative researchMedical EducationBiochemistryBiological sciences
Objective: To identify the sources of learning gaps in biochemistry teaching and learning and explore new teaching and learning strategies, considering the students' perceptions and felt needs.
Study Design: Exploratory qualitative study (Social-constructivist philosophical worldview).
Place and Duration of Study: Public Sector Medical College, Pakistan, from Jul 2020 to Jul 2021.
Methodology: Students from all five years of medical college were recruited voluntarily after their written consent. Ten focus group discussions were conducted, each consisting of approximately 8 to 12 participants. Each session was recorded and then later transcribed verbatim. Verbatim FGDs were reviewed, and codes were given as the concept became recognizable. A code structure was developed via an inductive approach, and then sub-themes and themes were generated.
Results: Ten major themes were generated from the FGDs. These themes were teaching, students’ motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, transition difficulty, attitudes, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment. These themes were further elucidated to explain the causes of the learning gaps and provide suggestions.
Conclusion: This study concludes that teaching, students’ motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, difficulty in transition, student attitude, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment are the potential sources of the learning gap to achieve intended learning outcomes of biochemistry for medical students.
To identify the sources of learning gaps in biochemistry teaching and learning and explore new teaching and learning strategies, considering the students' perceptions and felt needs.
Exploratory qualitative study with a social-constructivist philosophical worldview. Ten focus group discussions were conducted with medical students from all five years. Data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach for reflexive thematic analysis.
graph TD;
A["Recruit Students Voluntary Consent"] --> B["Conduct Focus Group Discussions"];
B --> C["Record and Transcribe FGDs"];
C --> D["Code Verbatim Transcripts"];
D --> E["Develop Code Structure Inductively"];
E --> F["Generate Sub-themes and Themes"];
F --> G["Validate Themes with Participants"];
G --> H["Analyze Documents and Observations"];
H --> I["Identify Learning Gaps and Strategies"];
The study discusses how teaching strategies, student motivation, the perceived clinical irrelevance of biochemistry, evolving educational needs, challenges in transitioning to medical school, student attitudes, lack of support, peer influence, curriculum coherence, and assessment methods all contribute to learning gaps. It emphasizes the need for modern, student-centered teaching strategies and technology integration.
Ten major themes emerged: teaching, students' motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, transition difficulty, attitudes, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment. These themes highlight various factors contributing to learning gaps in biochemistry.
Teaching, student motivation, clinical irrelevance, educational needs, difficulty in transition, student attitude, student support, senior peers, curriculum coherence, and assessment are identified as potential sources of learning gaps in biochemistry for medical students. The study suggests new teaching and learning strategies based on student perceptions.
1. The study was conducted at a Public Sector Medical College, Pakistan, from July 2020 to July 2021.
2. Ten focus group discussions were conducted, with each group consisting of approximately 8 to 12 participants, totaling 102 participants.
3. The article was published in Pak Armed Forces Med J 2024; 74(2): 522-529.
Loading PDF...
Loading Statistics...